And these stories echo those told to us by elite-level hockey players who participated in our small interview-based study in 2021 where we explored how participants resisted the expectations of hypermasculinity in hockey culture.
An established history
In June 2022, Hockey Canada was summoned to speak at the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage in response to the organization’s settlement for the alleged sexual assault of a woman by players at a Hockey Canada event.
There, Hockey Canada CEO Tom Renney said the alleged incident committed by members of Canada’s 2017-18 U20 Men’s World Junior Team was “unacceptable and incompatible with Hockey Canada’s values and expectations.”
We disagree. This is entirely on brand — the assault, the impulse to cover it up and the broader community’s attempt to label this as an isolated incident. This is part of hockey culture.
Rather than finger-pointing, the hockey community needs to consider the ways entrenched hierarchies, rewarded performances of masculinity and enforcement of a “bro code” encourage this behaviour.
The tragedy is not just that this happened, but that Hockey Canada’s first impulse was to protect their image and that not a single team member came forward.
What happens in the dressing room stays there
One of our research participants spoke about how being a good teammate means being silent:
“There’s stuff that happens in the dressing room, obviously, talking about girls, parties, whatever is the case, that happens in there, that sort of stays in there for the most part. Well, on good teams it stays in there. Whether it’s who you’re hooking up with, if you got sent pictures from some girl, everyone sees them. So it stays in the dressing room and it’s a team builder. It’s not to embarrass people in front of the outside world.”
This locker room culture encourages and rewards particular performances of masculinity. And players who don’t adhere to implicit and explicit organizational expectations risk being ostracized.
Despite this, anonymous participants in our study willingly recognized the inherent sexism in hockey culture and told stories of women and girls being used for props and “points” at team events. One participant shared, “I had a coach do body shots off a 15-year-old girl at a rookie party.”
This narrative touches on many issues in hockey culture: the normalization of underage drinking and partying, the objectification of women and girls, the lack of social responsibility and the complicity of coaches.
These stories are the result of broader hockey culture, and Hockey Canada can only affect change once they scrutinize the underlying culture that normalizes and rewards this behaviour.
Education for new understandings in hockey culture
Hockey Canada’s CEO also said the organization is interested in addressing “behavioural issues” through changes to its code of conduct and improved education programs. As educators, we suggest Hockey Canada:
- Reflect on its own response to allegations of sexual assault. What is it teaching hockey players about sexual violence, consent and human value, when the impulse is to pay, privilege and protect players?
- Recognize that these issues are systemic, and work to change the culture of hockey rather than centring discussions on individual “bad apples.”
- Make discussions and workshops about sexual violence, consent and healthy relationships part of team training.
- Make space for discussions about the “brand” of masculinity that is expected, promoted and rewarded in hockey culture. Our research made it clear that no overt discussions of masculinity had previously occurred, which had consequences on the mental and physical health of participants.
- Interrogate the institutional practices that reward particular performances of masculinity. Consider how the rigid hierarchies in hockey culture contribute to a culture of silencing.
- Go beyond the superficial. Rather than using corporate campaigns to re-brand hockey, meaningfully engage in critique.
Those who initiate criticism against hockey culture are often met with emotional and passionate rebukes that “the game is changing.” And incidents of reprehensible behaviour are regularly dismissed as involving a small number of players and not indicative of a deep-rooted systemic problem.
We believe it is critical to continually bring into question and interrogate how gender is understood, constructed and performed by all those who are involved in hockey to truly change the culture.
Shannon D. M. Moore, Assistant professor of social studies education, Department of Curriculum Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, University of Manitoba; Teresa Anne Fowler, Assistant Professor, Education, Concordia University of Edmonton, and Tim Skuce, Associate Professor, Curriculum and Pedagogy, Brandon University